AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KATHY J.S. WU, Respondent, v. CHUNG S. KAO, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefore a provision granting the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment entered December 31, 1990, only to the extent that the provision awarding attorney's fees is vacated; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendant.

The law is well settled that a civil litigant may not recover attorney's fees in the absence of contractual or statutory authority (see, Matter of Green [Potter], 51 N.Y.2d 627, 629-630; Plancher v. Gladstein, 143 A.D.2d 740). As no such authority exists here, the award of attorney's fees should have been vacated.

However, we reject the defendant's remaining contentions that the judgment was otherwise procured by fraud and should have been vacated (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [3]). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WU v. KAO
(Jun 14, 1993)