Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CHARLES AYOTTE et al., Respondents, v. FRANCIS P. GERVASIO et al., Defendants, and JOSEPH W. LE FEBVRE et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative.

"[T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact" (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324). The "[f]ailure to make such prima facie showing requires a denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers" (id., at 324). Here, in support of their summary judgment motion, movants merely assert that defendant's negligent operation of his vehicle was the sole proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries and that no triable issues of fact existed. These conclusory assertions are insufficient to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and SMITH concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AYOTTE v. GERVASIO
(Jun 15, 1993)