AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT O. HARRINGTON, Appellant.

Defendant's only contention on this appeal is that the $500 fine and concurrent sentences of one year in jail are harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentences ultimately imposed, which are less than the harshest possible. Under these circumstances, and in light of defendant's criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentences imposed by County Court (see, People v Mackey, 136 A.D.2d 780, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 899).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HARRINGTON
(Jul 1, 1993)