AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ELIZABETH HILL et al., Appellants, v. CARMEN W. LUNA et al., Defendants, and JAMES CRONSHAW et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants Cronshaw for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint. Plaintiff Elizabeth Hill was injured while a passenger in an automobile driven by defendant Betty M. Cronshaw. Another motorist ran a red light and collided with the Cronshaw vehicle, which was proceeding through a green light at a speed of approximately 15 to 20 miles per hour. The Cronshaws established through the deposition testimony of Betty Cronshaw and Elizabeth Hill that the former "did all that a reasonable person would be expected to do under the circumstances" by proceeding with caution (Mansfield v. Graff, 47 A.D.2d 581, 582; see also, Safran v Amato, 155 A.D.2d 653, 654). In response, plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally, Friends of Animals v. Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 N.Y.2d 1065).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILL v. LUNA
(Jul 16, 1993)