Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defense counsel's representation of defendant, viewed in its entirety, was meaningful (see, People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 798-799; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147; People v. Arnold, 188 A.D.2d 1020). Because no objection was made to County Court's failure to conduct a de novo Sandoval hearing in defendant's second trial, any error in that regard has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05). We decline to consider that issue as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15).
We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.