Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Joshua P. Cohn, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant ( John J. Fahy, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney). Michael Chazen, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Arturo R. Whyte ( Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney). Terry Shaw, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent Fitz G. Byfield ( Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney). James W. Donnelly, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Barrington Aird ( Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
  • WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ., dissenting.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Joshua P. Cohn, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant ( John J. Fahy, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney). Michael Chazen, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Arturo R. Whyte ( Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney). Terry Shaw, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent Fitz G. Byfield ( Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney). James W. Donnelly, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Barrington Aird ( Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
  • WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ., dissenting.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTURO R. WHYTE,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 265 N.J. Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).

WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ., dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell's dissenting opinion, reported at 265 N.J. Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992). For affirmance — Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O'HERN and STEIN — 4

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and HANDLER and GARIBALDI — 3

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

STATE v. WHYTE
(Aug 2, 1993)