AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES REED, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no basis to disturb the suppression court's determination that the showup identification of defendant by Sergeant Smith was not impermissibly suggestive. Because the showup was proximate in time and space to the scene of the crime, it was an appropriate means of securing a prompt identification (see, People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 1023, 1024). Additionally, the possibility of misidentification was greatly reduced because the confirmatory identification was made by a police officer who was trained to be both accurate and objective (see, People v. Morales, 37 N.Y.2d 262; People v. Rupert, 192 A.D.2d 1072; People v. Snow, 128 A.D.2d 564).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. REED
(Oct 1, 1993)