AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PEDRO TAPIA, Appellant.

Defendant's argument that his plea should not have been accepted is unpreserved for review as a matter of law, and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Were we to do so, we would find that the victim had identified defendant the day after the incident while hospitalized as a result of the beating he received from defendant. Unlike an allocution that actually negates an essential element of the crime pleaded to, the failure of a pleading defendant to recite every element of the crime does not necessarily suggest that the guilty plea is improvident or baseless so as to trigger a duty on the part of the court to inquire further (People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kassal, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. TAPIA
(Oct 7, 1993)