Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

EDWARD E. ALLEN, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment sua sponte denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. ORS 34.370(6); ORS 34.710. His petition alleged that his confinement was illegal because he was improperly sentenced. We affirm.

Under ORS 34.370(6), a court may deny, sua sponte, a meritless petition brought under ORS 34.362. However, a petition brought under ORS 34.362 can only challenge conditions of confinement. The court improperly denied plaintiff's petition, which challenged the authority for his confinement under ORS 34.360.

Although the sua sponte denial under ORS 34.370(6) was improper, the error was harmless. Under ORS 34.330(3), habeas corpus relief is not available for issues that could have been addressed in post-conviction proceedings. The alleged error in plaintiff's sentence could have been challenged in a post-conviction proceeding or on direct appeal.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALLEN v. MAASS
(Oct 20, 1993)