AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN KILLEEN, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's argument that New York's statutory scheme (Penal Law § 10.00; § 30.00 [2]; CPL 1.20; 180.75, 210.43), which permits persons between the ages of 13 and 15 who commit serious violations of the Penal Law to be treated differently than those young persons who commit nonserious violations, violates the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions (see, People v Ryals, 100 Misc.2d 551). Further, the defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KILLEEN
(Nov 1, 1993)