Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Since the defendant did not raise any issue concerning the validity of his post-plea arrest, or deny any involvement in the underlying crime, the court did not err in failing to conduct an inquiry into the matter. Thus, it was proper for the court to impose enhanced sentences (see, People v Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702; People v Ayers, 192 A.D.2d 1134). The defendant's contention that the court should have afforded him an opportunity to withdraw his pleas is without merit (cf., People v White, 144 A.D.2d 711; People v Rosa, 194 A.D.2d 755).
The defendant's sentences were not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.