Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARK DACOSTA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse Appellant's sentence as to count III, which the state correctly concedes must be amended to reflect a misdemeanor conviction for simple assault.

We affirm Appellant's sentence as a habitual offender, under count I, notwithstanding the court's failure to make the requisite statutory findings, under section 775.041[ 775.084(1)(a)] 1. and 2., Florida Statutes (1991), which the record reflects was harmless error. Herrington v. State, 622 So.2d 1339, (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) ( en banc). We certify to the supreme court the same question certified in Herrington.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DACOSTA v. STATE
(Nov 3, 1993)