AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANA J. HULSE, Appellant.

Defendant received concurrent prison sentences of 2 to 6 years and 5 to 15 years on his conviction of two counts of arson in the third degree. He also received concurrent prison sentences of 2 to 6 years on his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and 5 to 15 years on his conviction of another count of arson in the third degree. The latter two sentences were to run consecutively to the first two sentences. Although defendant contends that the sentences were harsh and excessive, they were imposed in accordance with the plea agreement. Under the circumstances and given the serious nature of the crimes involved, as well as defendant's criminal history, we find no reason to disturb the sentences imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HULSE
(Nov 10, 1993)