Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly rejected the defendant's Statute of Limitations defense, as the complaint states a cause of action to recover damages for conversion, and the action was commenced within the applicable three-year Statute of Limitations (see, e.g., Sporn v MCA Records, 58 N.Y.2d 482, 488; Two Clinton Sq. Corp. v Friedler, 91 A.D.2d 1193; CPLR 214).
We further find that the defendant failed to establish its defenses sufficiently to warrant judgment in its favor as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). The parties' conflicting affidavits presented credibility issues which should not be resolved on a motion for summary judgment (see, Capelin Assocs. v Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 N.Y.2d 338, 341; Dyckman v Barrett 187 A.D.2d 553). Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied. Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, O'Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.