AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MICHAEL HERSHBERGER, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, BRENDA HERSHBERGER, et al., Respondents, v. WALTER SCHWARTZ et al., Defendants. GLORIA LABORDE et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents,

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that third-party defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Nationwide) has a duty to defend its insureds in the underlying personal injury action alleging negligent entrustment of a dangerous instrumentality to an infant (see, Cone v Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 75 N.Y.2d 747; see also, Technicon Elecs. Corp. v American Home Assur. Co., 74 N.Y.2d 66, 73-74; Seaboard Sur. Co. v Gillette Co., 64 N.Y.2d 304, 310; International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 N.Y.2d 322, 325-326). The court erred, however, in awarding third-party plaintiffs costs and attorney's fees incurred in bringing the third-party action. An insured is not entitled to recover the costs and expenses of bringing an affirmative action to settle his rights, but may recover only when he has been cast in a defensive posture by the action of an insurer in an effort to absolve itself from its policy obligations (Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 12, 21; Johnson v General Mut. Ins. Co., 24 N.Y.2d 42, 50; AFA Protective Sys. v Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 157 A.D.2d 683, 686). The court also erred in denying Nationwide's motion to dismiss the cross claim of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs cannot maintain a direct claim against Nationwide. Plaintiffs are strangers to the homeowners' insurance policy and may not seek enforcement of the insurer's obligation under the policy (Clarendon Place Corp. v Landmark Ins. Co., 182 A.D.2d 6, 8-9, lv denied and appeal dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 918). Plaintiffs may commence a direct action against defendants' insurer only when a judgment has been rendered against the insureds and the judgment remains unsatisfied 30 days after entry (see, Insurance Law § 3420 [a] [2]).

Therefore, the order is modified by dismissing plaintiffs' cross claim in its entirety and denying the application of third-party plaintiffs insofar as the application sought costs and attorney's fees incurred in bringing the third-party action.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HERSHBERGER v. SCHWARTZ
(Nov 19, 1993)