Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition reinstated and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: After a hearing, petitioner was removed from his membership in the Culver-Ridge Fire District for misconduct (see, General Municipal Law § 209-i). Petitioner commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent's determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition. We reverse.
Petitioner was entitled to sufficient notice of the charges against him and of the rules, policies or procedures that he allegedly violated (see, Montrois v City of Watertown, 115 A.D.2d 298, appeal dismissed 67 N.Y.2d 757; see also, General Municipal Law § 209-i; Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 N.Y.2d 323). The charges against petitioner were asserted only in general terms and respondent failed to identify the department rules, policies or procedures that petitioner allegedly violated. Furthermore, respondent made no findings to support its determination. Therefore, we reinstate the petition and remit the matter to respondent for the purpose of conducting a new hearing grounded on specific charges of misconduct.