Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Since the defendant provided a correct address at the time of the accident and informed the Department of Motor Vehicles of her change in address, and since the plaintiff has failed to show that the defendant engaged in any conduct which was calculated to prevent the plaintiff from ascertaining her new address, we find no basis to estop the defendant from challenging service at her former address (see, Feinstein v Bergner, 48 N.Y.2d 234; Cuomo v Cuomo, 144 A.D.2d 331; cf., Hill v Jones, 113 A.D.2d 874; Kramer v Ryder Truck Rental, 112 A.D.2d 194). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.