Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PATRICIA POLLAK WEISS AND THOMAS POLLAK, APPELLANTS, v. ARTHUR H. COURSHON AND JACK R. COURSHON, AS TRUSTEES OF A TRUST OF AARON COURSHON, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Pollak Weiss and Thomas Pollak appeal an order denying their motion to intervene. We entirely agree with the substance of the trial court's ruling, which granted Weiss and Pollak certain notification rights, but denied them full party status. In light of the recent decision in Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1992), it is more accurate to say that the order under review is one which grants limited intervention. With that technical modification in terminology, we affirm the order under review. We emphasize that this change in terminology in the order does not confer on appellants any other or greater rights than those delineated in the trial court's order.

Affirmed as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEISS v. COURSHON
(Dec 7, 1993)