AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

STEPHEN COTTONE, Respondent, v. VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the required notice of the subject occurrence was sent to the appellant as soon as it was practical to do so under the facts and circumstances of this case (see, Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 12). The record sufficiently demonstrates that the plaintiff possessed a good faith belief of nonliability. Therefore, his delay in informing the appellant of the subject occurrence is excusable under the circumstances (see, Empire City Subway Co. v Greater N Y Mut. Ins. Co., 35 N.Y.2d 8).

We reject the appellant's remaining contention (see, Fitzpatrick v American Honda Motor Co., 78 N.Y.2d 61, 63). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COTTONE v. VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY
(Dec 13, 1993)