Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. FRANCISCO RAMOS, JOSE RAMOS, AND LAZARO DIAZ, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Ramos, 608 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

That portion of the district court's decision that affirmed the trial court's order dismissing the charges against Lazaro Diaz is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993). The case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. RAMOS
(Dec 16, 1993)