AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of JEANMARIE SLEDGE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM et al., Respondents.

Weiss, P.J.

Petitioner, a police officer with the East Hampton Police Department in Suffolk County, applied for performance of duty disability benefits relating to an occurrence on November 15, 1987 when she assisted an ambulance driver in lifting a 250-pound woman. The sole issue is whether, based upon conflicting medical testimony, there is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent Comptroller's determination that petitioner failed to sustain her burden of proof that she is permanently incapacitated from the performance of police officer duties.

The Comptroller is legislatively delegated with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits (Retirement and Social Security Law § 374 [b]), which authority includes resolution of issues of credibility and conflicting evidence. The Comptroller's determination must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Catalano v New York State Comptroller, 198 A.D.2d 662). Where, as here, conflicting medical testimony is presented, the Comptroller's evaluation and crediting of the witnesses and evidence must be accepted if supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Heavey v Regan, 161 A.D.2d 917, 918). We find that the testimony of medical experts, albeit conflicting in their opinions, amply supports the Comptroller's determination.

Mikoll, Mercure, Cardona and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SLEDGE v. NEW YORK STATE POLICE
(Dec 30, 1993)