Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROGER M. HILLMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. GARY McCAUGHTRY, WARDEN, WAUPUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

This case is an appeal from the judgment of the district court that denied relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to the petitioner. The case is currently under advisement after briefing and oral argument.

By letter to the Clerk, dated January 3, 1994, counsel for the petitioner had advised this court that the petitioner died on December 21, 1993. This case is therefore moot. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss the case as moot. See Knapp v. Baker, 509 F.2d 922, 922 (5th Cir. 1975); Gornto v. MacDougall, 482 F.2d 361, 361 (5th Cir. 1973). See also United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

No costs are to be assessed in this court.

VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILLMAN v. McCAUGHTRY
(Jan 19, 1994)