AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL BUTLER, Also Known as MICHAEL MAILS, Appellant.

Defendant's contention that his pleas were not knowingly and intelligently entered has not been preserved for review, as a matter of law, since he did not move to withdraw the pleas or to vacate the judgment of conviction (People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665), and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. If we were to consider this contention, we would find that those pleas were properly entered, in view of, inter alia, defendant's colloquy with Criminal Term concerning the effect of those pleas on his status as a felony offender, and his familiarity with the criminal justice system, as a result of his extensive criminal record (see, People v. Montford, 134 A.D.2d 207, 208, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 1009).

We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BUTLER
(Jan 25, 1994)