Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BRIAN E. DEWITT, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that deferred his parole release date for 18 months after he violated his parole. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board's reliance on documents not disclosed to him during a prison term hearing violates his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

We have decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or. App. 331, 862 P.2d 1312 (1993).

Petitioner's other arguments do not require discussion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DEWITT v. BD. OF PAROLE POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
(Feb 1, 1994)