AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ARLENE C. FARKAS, Respondent, v. BRUCE R. FARKAS, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

The order is enforceable by contempt in this matrimonial action (Domestic Relations Law § 245) and contempt is also appropriate for willful non-compliance with a support order (Family Ct Act § 454; Judiciary Law § 753 [A] [8]). Nor is it necessary for plaintiff to exhaust all possible alternative collection remedies before contempt can be found where the history of the action shows that such remedies would be ineffectual (see, Bell v Bell, 181 A.D.2d 978, 979).

Defendant was properly found to be in willful disobedience of the court's support order (see, Matter of McCormick v. Axelrod, 59 N.Y.2d 574, 583). Further, the record shows that the Special Referee conducted a fair and proper hearing and did not exceed the authority granted.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FARKAS v. FARKAS
(Feb 24, 1994)