Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

SIDNEY B. MORICE, PETITIONER/RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT N. MORICE, RESPONDENT/APPELLANT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court's modification of the support payments portion of a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MORICE v. MORICE
(Mar 1, 1994)