Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TEODOMIRO GOMEZ-RODRIQUEQ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Teodomiro Gomez-Rodriqueq entered a plea of nolo contendere to the offense of purchase of cocaine a violation of § 893.13(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes (1991). He was adjudicated guilty and placed on probation for four years with special conditions. We affirm the conviction, the sentence and the conditions of probation except one: we strike condition 21. Condition 21 requires that appellant consume no alcoholic beverages. There is no evidence in the record on appeal that the offense was alcohol related. The condition is, therefore, invalid. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla. 1993).

AFFIRMED as modified.

W. SHARP, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOMEZ-RODRIQUEQ v. STATE
(Mar 4, 1994)