AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATE FULTON, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err by imposing sentence upon defendant after he was removed from the courtroom. Although a defendant has the right to be present and heard at sentencing (CPL 380.40, 380.50 Crim. Proc.), he forfeits that right by engaging in "obstreperous conduct" (People v. Stroman, 36 N.Y.2d 939, 940; see also, People v. Herrera, 160 A.D.2d 416, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 789). The conduct of defendant at sentencing was sufficiently "obstreperous" to effect a forfeiture of his right to be present.

The contention that defendant's sentence is harsh and excessive is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FULTON
(Mar 11, 1994)