C.I.C. CORP. v. EAST BRUNSWICK TP, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Keith N. Biebelberg argued the cause for appellants ( Biebelberg Martin, attorneys; Mr. Biebelberg and Barry D. Maurer, on the briefs). Bertram E. Busch argued the cause for respondent ( Busch and Busch, attorneys; Mr. Busch and Kenneth A. Levine, of counsel and on the brief). John M. Loalbo submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amici curiae Action on Smoking and Health and Group Against Smoking Pollution. John G. Gilfillan submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Tri-Agency Council ( Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart Olstein, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Keith N. Biebelberg argued the cause for appellants ( Biebelberg Martin, attorneys; Mr. Biebelberg and Barry D. Maurer, on the briefs). Bertram E. Busch argued the cause for respondent ( Busch and Busch, attorneys; Mr. Busch and Kenneth A. Levine, of counsel and on the brief). John M. Loalbo submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amici curiae Action on Smoking and Health and Group Against Smoking Pollution. John G. Gilfillan submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Tri-Agency Council ( Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart Olstein, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

C.I.C. CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, COAST CIGARETTE SALES, INC.,A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ESKIN VENDING CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEYCORPORATION, AND AMUSEMENT MUSIC OPERATORS ASSOCIATION,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 266 N.J. Super. 1, 628 A.2d 753 (1993).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.

For reversal — none.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

C.I.C. CORP. v. EAST BRUNSWICK TP

C.I.C. CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, COAST CIGARETTE SALES, INC.,A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ESKIN VENDING CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEYCORPORATION, AND AMUSEMENT MUSIC OPERATORS ASSOCIATION,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Comments