Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANGEL MEDINA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's convictions. We also affirm his sentences for same except as to restitution.

The trial court imposed restitution upon appellant pursuant to section 775.089, Florida Statutes (1991). However, there was no hearing on the matter, nor did the trial court mention restitution in its oral pronouncement of sentence. The parties agree that a hearing must be conducted before restitution may be imposed. Williams v. State, 588 So.2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also Snell v. State, 502 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 509 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1987). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of restitution and remand for a restitution hearing.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEDINA v. STATE
(Mar 30, 1994)