AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., PLAINTIFF, v. DUNMAR CORP. AND MICHAEL D. JONES, DEFENDANTS-COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS, THE FIRST F.A., DEFENDANT-COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT, SHERMAN DANTZLER AND JACK SHIREK, DEFENDANTS, AND THE FIRST F.A. OF ORLANDO AND RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., COUNTER-DEFENDANTS. MICHAEL D. JONES; ROBERT S. GUSKIEWICZ; R.S. FUTCH, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion November 23, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F.3d 1006)

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. v. DUNMAR CORP
(Apr 12, 1994)