AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND ANDERSON, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We note initially that the general waiver of his right to appeal which the defendant executed did not effectively waive the claim which he now raises, i.e., that his plea was not entered voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently (see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 11).

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without conducting a hearing (see, CPL 220.60; People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 527; People v Dickerson, 163 A.D.2d 610). A review of the record fails to support the defendant's contention that his responses at the plea proceeding were not lucid and rational. Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
(Apr 11, 1994)