Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
While any ambiguity concerning the kind of coverage that was obtained must be interpreted in favor of the insured (see, e.g., Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Annunziato, 187 A.D.2d 429), the determination of the Supreme Court that the policy obtained by the appellant did not provide underinsured motorist coverage is the only reasonable interpretation of that policy and is amply supported by the record. Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.