Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Upon the evidence presented to the Family Court, there was no indication that meaningful visitation in the form of unsupervised visitation, which is the right of both the father and his twin daughters, would be detrimental to the welfare of the children (see, Nascon v Nascon, 166 A.D.2d 510; Shink v Shink, 140 A.D.2d 506; Resnick v Zoldan, 134 A.D.2d 246). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Family Court's determination to allow the father unsupervised visitation (see, Matter of Darlene T., 28 N.Y.2d 391; Valenza v Valenza, 143 A.D.2d 860). Lawrence, J.P., O'Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.