Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRUCE LAMBERT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's convictions and sentences, but we reverse a condition of probation that appellant have no contact with children under age 10. This was the only condition of probation appellant raised as error. We reverse this condition because it is too broad. The condition of probation must be more specific so that appellant cannot be charged with an unintentional violation of it. Lambert v. State, 635 So.2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); see Dean v. State, 629 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAMBERT v. STATE
(Apr 27, 1994)