Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EARL WAYNE COATS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION AND HYTORC, M.E., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-APPELLEES.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COATS v. PENROD DRILLING CORP
(Apr 28, 1994)