Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant has failed to provide any evidence to demonstrate that the pendente lite award constituted an improper exercise of discretion (see, Filosa v. Raven-Filosa, 185 A.D.2d 225; Guiry v Guiry, 159 A.D.2d 556). Moreover, the remedy for a pendente lite award claimed to be unsatisfactory is a speedy trial, at which a more detailed examination of the situation of the parties may be made (see, Filosa v. Raven-Filosa, supra; Erdheim v. Erdheim, 101 A.D.2d 803). Lawrence, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.