Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Joseph T. VOELLER, Deceased. Gary HOFFART, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Da

PER CURIAM.

Gary Hoffart appealed from a summary judgment entered in county court denying Hoffart's petition to probate a codicil to the will of Joseph Voeller, entered on a "Motion for Summary Judgment on Petition for Probate of a Codicil," filed by Voeller's children. Distribution of the estate has not been approved; discharge of the personal representative is not final; no Rule 54(b), NDRCivP, certification has been made. The judgment is a partial summary judgment; it is not final, and it is not appealable. Central Power Elec. Co-op v. C-K, Inc., 512 N.W.2d 711 (N.D. 1994); Matter of Estate of Starcher, 447 N.W.2d 293 (N.D. 1989); Matter of Estate of Erickson, 368 N.W.2d 525 (N.D. 1985); Cf. Meyer v. City of Dickinson, 397 N.W.2d 460 (N.D. 1986).

The appeal is dismissed.

VANDE WALLE, C.J., and SANDSTROM, NEUMANN, LEVINE and MESCHKE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ESTATE OF VOELLER
(Jun 15, 1994)