The record establishes by clear and convincing evidence that, despite petitioner's exercise of due diligence to strengthen the parental relationship, through counseling, visitation arrangements and social assistance, appellant failed, substantially and continuously, for more than one year, to maintain contact with the child or to plan for the child's future to the extent physically and financially possible (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 142-143). There is no statutory requirement that the agency actively superintend a comprehensive range of social and medical programs, including arranging for the mother's learning to read and closely managing her emotional therapy (see, Matter of Anonymous, 40 N.Y.2d 96).
The mother did not object to the admission of certain "progress notes" as hearsay during the factfinding hearing, and cannot now raise the issue for the first time (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 188 A.D.2d 214, 225-226, affd 82 N.Y.2d 821). In any event, the case records were correctly received as business records (see, Matter of F. Children, 199 A.D.2d 81).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.