AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JAMES SHIELDS, Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with the reasoning in the decision at Supreme Court (Doyle, J.). The court, rather than dismissing the complaint, should have declared the rights of the parties (see, Maurizzio v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 73 N.Y.2d 951, 954; Pless v. Town of Royalton, 185 A.D.2d 659, 660, affd 81 N.Y.2d 1047). We modify the order appealed from, therefore, by reinstating the complaint and granting judgment declaring that the City of Buffalo was entitled to cease payments pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a when plaintiff reached the age of 62, the mandatory service retirement age applicable to him.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHIELDS v. CITY OF BUFFALO
(Jul 15, 1994)