Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff, by failing to object to the verdict as inconsistent before the jury was discharged, did not preserve that argument for appellate review (see, e.g., Barone v. City of Mount Vernon, 170 A.D.2d 557). In any event, the verdict was not inconsistent (see, Barry v. Manglass, 55 N.Y.2d 803). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.