Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Ernest Elmer Clark, Appellant against Mister Kleen Maintenance Company, et al., Appellees Mister Kleen Maintenance Company, et al., Appellants against Ernest Elmer Clark, Appellee

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC OPINION

On December 14, 1993 a panel of this Court affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission). See Mister Kleen Maintenance Co. v. Clark, 17 Va. App. 474, 438, S.E.2d 304 (1993). The employer's petition for rehearing en banc was granted on January 20, 1994, and the mandate of the December 14, 1993 was stayed.

The appeal was reheard en banc on June 2, 1994. For the reasons stated in the original majority opinion, the Court affirms the decision of the commission in all respects except as to the determination of the conclusive presumption of permanent total disability. On that issue, for the reasons stated in the original majority opinion, the finding of the commission is reversed. Accordingly, the stay of the mandate of the December 14, 1993 opinion is lifted and the case remanded to the commission for final action consistent with that opinion and its adoption by this order.

Chief Judge Moon and Judges Coleman and Baker, for the reasons stated in Judge Coleman's dissent from the original decision, 17 Va. App. at 477-78, 438 S.E.2d at 306 (Coleman, J., dissenting), would reverse the findings of the commission and dismiss the claim.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MISTER KLEEN MAINTENANCE CO. v. CLARK
(Aug 23, 1994)