Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Charles MEKKAM, Petitioner on Re v. ew/Respondent on Re

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petitions for review are allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 114 S Ct 1510, 128 L Ed 2d 274 (1994).

Our allowance of both petitions does not represent any opinion as to the validity of any argument asserted by either petitioner.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEKKAM v. OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIV
(Aug 25, 1994)