Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs' contention that the defendant Allied Bayview Corporation is estopped from denying ownership of the property where she was injured was never raised before the Supreme Court and thus may not be asserted for the first time on appeal (see, Marazzo v. Frontier Ins. Co., 189 A.D.2d 755; Reyes v. 38 Sickles St. Corp., 188 A.D.2d 518). In any event, we find this claim to be without merit. Nor have the plaintiffs demonstrated the existence of any genuine issues of material fact so as to warrant the denial of the defendant's motion. Sullivan, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and Krausman, JJ., concur.