Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAY PULLES, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed. Although the State concedes a 15-point error on the guidelines scoresheet, appellant is entitled to no relief because the correction would not change his guidelines range. See Orsi v. State, 515 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We do not reach appellant's argument (raised for the first time on appeal) that there is error in the scoring of his prior record because that argument was not presented to the trial court.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PULLES v. STATE
(Aug 31, 1994)