AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEE YATES, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Because he failed to object to the prosecutor's remarks on summation, to seek curative instructions, or to move for a mistrial, the defendant has not preserved for appellate review his objections to the prosecutor's summation (see, People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818; People v. Acevedo, 156 A.D.2d 569; People v Coker, 135 A.D.2d 723; People v. Richardson, 114 A.D.2d 980; People v. Baldo, 107 A.D.2d 751). In any event, the prosecutor's comments made during summation did not deprive the defendant of his due process right to a fair trial (see, e.g., People v Gordon, 180 A.D.2d 748). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. YATES
(Aug 29, 1994)