AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PETER McKIERNAN, Appellant, v. MARY A. McKIERNAN, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In determining whether to grant leave to amend a pleading, a court must examine the underlying merit of the causes of action asserted therein, since to do otherwise would be wasteful of judicial resources (see, Wieder v. Skala, 168 A.D.2d 355). Although leave to amend a pleading is liberally granted, where, as here, the proposed amendment is patently lacking in merit, it will not be permitted and leave should be denied as a matter of law (see, Staines v. Nassau Queens Med. Group, 176 A.D.2d 718; Hauptman v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 162 A.D.2d 588). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McKIERNAN v. McKIERNAN
(Sep 19, 1994)