AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of STEPHEN PERICAK et al., Appellants, v. JAMES P. HOOPER et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in concluding that this proceeding was not timely commenced. Election Law § 16-102 (2), as amended, "[b]y its clear and unambiguous language, * * * permits a proceeding to be commenced within three business days after the board `makes a determination of invalidity with respect to such petition'" (Matter of Godzisz v. Mohr, 197 A.D.2d 839). Because the date of determination was Wednesday, July 27, 1994, the first business day of the statutory period was Thursday, July 28, 1994 (see, General Construction Law § 20).

Inasmuch as the court did not rule on the specific objections to the petition, we remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the merits.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF PERICAK v. HOOPER
(Sep 30, 1994)