AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. FRANCISCO URENA, Respondent.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 25, 1993, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated April 23, 1993, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 23, 1993, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The record indicates that the petitioner Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate) had ample time, i.e., several months prior to the commencement of the instant arbitration proceeding, within which to seek discovery of the respondent insured as provided for in the insurance policy, and unjustifiably failed to utilize that opportunity. Under the circumstances disclosed in this record, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the petition which was for a temporary stay of arbitration pending discovery (cf., Matter of MVAIC [Lucash], 16 A.D.2d 975, 976). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. URENA
(Oct 11, 1994)