Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the arresting officer's testimony improperly bolstered the identification testimony of the undercover police officer. However, the alleged errors are unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant merely registered a general objection or objected on specified grounds which are different from the grounds he raises on appeal (see, People v. West, 56 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Thompson, 203 A.D.2d 497; People v. Hynes, 193 A.D.2d 516). In any event, the errors, if any, do not warrant reversal in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.